| << . 1 . 2 . |
| Author |
Message |
Julie2Oregon
Member
|
# Posted: 7 Sep 2016 21:56 - Edited by: Julie2Oregon
Reply
Quoting: bldginsp Are you sure you can put the cabin on the property line?
There's a covenant on the land that the two parcels must be sold together. So the "property line" is pretty much artificial since, legally, they're not separate parcels and can't be sold as such.
|
|
toyota_mdt_tech
Member
|
# Posted: 8 Sep 2016 22:18
Reply
Its separate for taxing purposes I bet. So how would the taxes be figured for the cabin, part of the cabin will go on one and rest on the other? I would think no buildings on the line as long as they are not combined. More for tax purposes.
|
|
Julie2Oregon
Member
|
# Posted: 9 Sep 2016 01:44
Reply
Quoting: toyota_mdt_tech Its separate for taxing purposes I bet. So how would the taxes be figured for the cabin, part of the cabin will go on one and rest on the other? I would think no buildings on the line as long as they are not combined. More for tax purposes.
Yes, Toyota, I think you're right. There's some sort of tax thing involved. I've noticed that some folks at Rocky Point have combined their lots as one parcel and some haven't. I need to investigate why that is. I haven't encountered a covenant previously on the other properties I looked at forbidding the lots from being sold separately.
The person selling the land to me is a contractor by trade. My Realtor says he'd love to meet me out there and share a bit of knowledge and history. I'd love that, too! I'm going to ask him about the pros and cons of keeping the lots separate for tax purposes, once the land is developed.
|
|
Just
Member
|
# Posted: 10 Sep 2016 19:35
Reply
If the water is less than 20 feet deep this may be of some help .Simply attach the stearlng wheel spinner to the large pully of this kind of pump, If you have power use, it if not crank it !!! it works I have one ..
61Pt7spP6kL._SY355_..jpg
| 
31307571.jpg
|  | |
|
|
| << . 1 . 2 . |
